Legal Opinion

Whittle v. Wolff

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1968PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages resulting from the removal of sand and gravel by defendant from land in which plaintiff claims an interest. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff.

Plaintiff is the guardian of Clifford Wilson, a member of the Klamath Indian Tribe, who was an “enrollee” of a parcel of Indian land. The United States, through the Bureau of Indian Affairs, conveyed the parcel to defendant by a deed containing the following reservation:

“All subsurface rights, except water, are hereby reserved in trust, for * * * Clifford Edgar Wilson * * *.”①

The reservation was inserted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Atwood v. RodmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  3. Farrell v. SayreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. Psencik v. WesselsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
  5. Cronkhite v. FalkensteinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Norken Corp. v. McGahanAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Chugach Natives, Inc. v. Doyon, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. State Land Department v. Tucson Rock and Sand Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Estate of DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API