Legal Opinion

Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Estate of Dillard

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2014No. 11CV0323; A154147PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.

This case concerns a dispute over the scope of a mineral rights reservation contained in a warranty deed that was executed in 1954 in Josephine County, Oregon. Defendant Skidmore, current owner of the mineral rights reservation, appeals a judgment of the trial court declaring that his rights “do not include any rights to sand, gravel, or other rock or earth materials, in whatever form, used for construction purposes.” Defendant does not challenge the trial court’s conclusion that sand and gravel are excluded from his mineral rights reservation, but he contends that “mineral” must be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Pacific First Bank v. New Morgan Park Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Eagle Industries, Inc. v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Copeland Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Estate of DillardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  2. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. v. Makarios-Oregon, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  3. Butler Family Ltd. Partnership v. Butler Bros., LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Heine v. Bank of OswegoDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
  5. Hawkins v. 1000 Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API