Legal Opinion

State Land Department v. Tucson Rock and Sand Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1971No. 10128-PRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Chief Justice.

This action arises out of the cancellation of State Mineral Lease M-109 issued for a 20-year term to appellee Tucson Rock and Sand Company. From the cancellation by the State Land Commissioner, Tucson Rock and Sand appealed to the Superior Court of Pima County. That court set aside the order of cancellation. The Court of Appeals reversed, and we accepted review. Opinion of the Court of Appeals, 12 Ariz.App. 193, 469 P.2d 85 vacated.

In 1952, appellee was issued a State Mineral Lease. By it, appellee was required to pay the State of Arizona a royalty of five cents for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Commonwealth v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  5. Pattermann v. City of WhitewaterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kadish v. Arizona State Land DepartmentArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Pima County by City of Tucson v. Maya Const. Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  5. State v. CassiusArizona Supreme Court · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API