Legal Opinion

Psencik v. Wessels

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1947No. 9654PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCLENDON, Chief Justice.

This suit presents the question whether sand and gravel constitutes minerals within the meaning of a reservation of all minerals in a deed, otherwise absolute, conveying farm lands.

Milly and Julie are sisters. As their patrimony (at least in part) they inherited in equal shares 174.9 acres of farm lands in Fayette County, in three tracts of 45, 18.5, and 111.4 acres respectively. In all transactions and proceedings herein involved their respective husbands joined. January 9, 1941, after some negotiation, for $1,100 cash, Milly conveyed her half interest in the three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson & Kerr Drilling Co. v. BruhlmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Northern Pacific Railway Company v. SoderbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. Right of Way Oil Co. v. Gladys City Oil, Gas & Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Luse v. BoatmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. Cage Brothers v. WhitemanTexas Supreme Court · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Heinatz v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Moser v. United States Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dyegard Land Partnership v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. San Jacinto Sand Co. v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  5. Atwood v. RodmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API