Portis v. Ballard
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Separate actions were instituted in the chancery court of Poinsett County by the commissioners of Water District No. 1 and Sewer District No. 2 of the town of Lepanto against W. B. Ballard and others, appellees, for the collection of alleged delinquent improvement district taxes, penalty and costs, and praying that liens be declared on the real property in the district and that same be subject to the payment of the delinquent taxes and penalties. The lands alleged to be delinquent were described and the amount of the assessments thereon set forth in a list which was attached as an exhibit to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hibben v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Board of Improvement District No. 5 v. OffenhauserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- House v. Road Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Stiewel v. Fencing District No. 6Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
- Paving Dists. 2 and 3 of Blytheville v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
3Cited by5 opinions
- Page v. Highway 10, Water Pipe Line Improvement District No. 1Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- Davidson v. Sewer Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Maumelle Boulevard Water & Sewer District No. 1 v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2007
- Snoddy v. Paving Improvement District No. 4 of MonticelloSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928