Legal Opinion
House v. Road Improvement District No. 2
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided April 16, 1923PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmiti-i, J.
Appellant, who was the plaintiff below, brought this suit to enjoin the collection of an assessment of betterments for road taxes against her lands by Road Improvement District No. 2 of Conway County. She alleged that she owned 3,217 acres lying in the district; that the ■ad valorem assessment against the land for general revenue purposes was $43,030, and that the benefits assessed for the improvement of the road were $19,035, which are payable in twenty annual installments of $1,516.15, amounting in all, with the interest thereon, to $30,323.
The road improvement district was created by act…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ballard v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Huling v. Kaw Valley Railway & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Pierce Oil Corp. v. City of HopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Booe v. Road Improvement District No. 4Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Salmon v. Board of Directors of Long Prairie Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McNutt v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Campbell v. Beaver Bayou Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Hudson v. SimonsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Road Improvement District No. 4 v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Texarkana Special School District v. Ritchie Grocer Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.