Legal Opinion
Davidson v. Sewer Improvement District
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 24, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
A sewer improvement district, designated as No. 1, was organized in the city of Fayetteville in 1907, and plaintiff has since continuously paid the annual assessment of benefits levied against his property lying therein. On January 5, 1925, another sewer improvement district was organized, which was designated as Annex No. 1 to Sewer Improvement District No. 1. This last district was adjacent to the first, and certain lots, including those of plaintiff, were in both districts.
'Betterments were assessed in the annex, and bonds were issued and. sold to the Mellroy Bank & Trust Company, of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jones v. Sewer Improvement District No. 3Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Kraft v. SmothersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Harrison v. AbingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Paving Dists. 2 and 3 of Blytheville v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Carney v. WalbeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gantt v. Arkansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Maumelle Boulevard Water & Sewer District No. 1 v. DavisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- State v. YoakumCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961