Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ball

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1985PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

The issue we decide is whether under KRS 189A.010, known generally as the “slammer” bill, convictions for driving under the influence received prior to July 13, 1984 (the effective date of the present statute), can be used in applying the penalty section of the statute in determining whether a person so convicted is a second (multiple) offender.

Respondent was cited for a violation of KRS 189A.010 on July 25, 1984, less than two weeks after the effective date of the new statute. At trial in the Campbell District Court, evidence was presented concerning his conviction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Moore v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  3. Joseph Pettway, Jr. v. The United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1954

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RamseyKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Fulcher v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ratliff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
  4. Hayden v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  5. Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Telly Savalas DensonKentucky Supreme Court · 2017

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API