Hayden v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
WEST, Judge.
Discretionary review was granted from orders of the Fayette Circuit Court and the Daviess Circuit Court which had affirmed convictions of Morton Hayden and William H. Clark for driving under the influence of alcohol (KRS 189A.010). We have consolidated the appeals because the basic question in both cases is whether impaired driving or impaired driving ability must be proven to sustain a conviction for a violation of KRS 189A.010 when the substance involved is alcohol. Or, stated in the affirmative: What elements must the Commonwealth prove beyond a reasonable doubt when an…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BallKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Cruse v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Botkin v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Bridges v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
- Kidd v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2004
- Lopez v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
- Adam Gray v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.