Ratliff v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
DUNN, Judge.
Appellants, Danny S. Ratliff and Leonard L. Carter, in these two cases seek review of their convictions by juries in the Fayette District Court for driving under the influence of alcohol, KRS 189A.010(1). Each appellant was determined to be a past offender of that statute or its predecessor, consequently each was accorded the mandatory enhanced sentences set out in KRS 189A.010(2).
On appeal, they raise numerous common challenges to the statute of both a constitutional and evidentiary nature, including their contentions that: 1) the mandatory sentencing provisions of KRS Chapter…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Baldasar v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cotton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970
- Commonwealth v. RichardsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Phon v. Com. of Ky.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Commonwealth v. RamseyKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Sargent v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
- Blades v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Ghoston v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.