Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ramsey

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1996No. 95-SC-161-DGPublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENS, Chief Justice.

The Commonwealth appeals from the Court of Appeals affirmance of a Circuit Court order. The order prohibited the introduction of appellee’s prior DUI convictions during the prosecution’s case-in-chief. We granted discretionary review to clarify the important issues raised by this appeal.

Appellee was indicted by the Pulaski Grand Jury for Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants, [hereinafter DUI] fourth offense, and Driving While License was Suspended, third offense. Prior to trial, appellee moved in limine to prohibit the introduction of her previous DUI convictions…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bell v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. O'Bryan v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Rearick v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hall v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Soto v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Beaty v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Caudill v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Quisenberry v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Barth v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2001

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API