Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 2, 1990No. 89-1354, 89-1379 and 89-1380PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On April 23, 1987, the Alabama State Bar ("the Bar"), pursuant to Rule 3(c), Ala.R.Disc.Enf., temporarily suspended the petitioner, S. Robert Brooks, III from the practice of law for the alleged conversion of his clients' money. Brooks was convicted of theft, in the Mobile Circuit Court; on appeal the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed, but on certiorari review this Court reversed the conviction and remanded the case. Brooks v. State, 562 So.2d 601 (Ala.Crim.App. 1989), rev'd, 562 So.2d 604 (Ala. 1990). As a result, there has not yet been a final disposition of the criminal charges against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Echols v. Housing Authority of AuburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. C & G Development v. Planning Com'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Ex Parte HattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Lanier Worldwide, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  2. Moore v. MooreCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte Lanier Worldwide, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. State v. BoldenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API