Legal Opinion

State v. Bolden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 28, 2005No. 1041094Published

1Per curiam

Lananderious Bolden was indicted for three counts of capital murder. Bolden moved to dismiss the indictment. At the hearing on the motion to dismiss, the trial court informed the parties that at the time of trial the court would order the State to elect one count of capital murder to pursue and it would then dismiss the remaining two counts. The State petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus and/or a writ of prohibition preventing the trial court from ordering the State to elect one of the three counts of capital murder to pursue at trial.

A writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition are…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte LyonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  2. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API