Legal Opinion

Echols v. Housing Authority of Auburn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1979No. 78-421, 78-422PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

These are appeals from the dismissal of amended petitions for writs of mandamus addressed to the District Court of Lee County. We affirm.

The appellants-defendants are tenants in a publicly subsidized apartment complex operated for low income tenants by the Housing Authority of the City of Auburn. During the period of their leases the tenants defaulted in the payment of rent. Ultimately the Authority initiated possessory actions under the provisions of Code of 1975, § 35-9-80, formerly Tit. 31, § 35,Alabama Code and popularly known as the "Sanderson Act." After a trial, the District Judge of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Poyner v. WhiddonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Finley v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ex Parte FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  2. Ex Parte StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte VanceSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  4. Ex Parte Houston CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Ex Parte ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API