Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hatton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 2, 1989No. 87-1326, 87-1333PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff Rhonda Hatton, as administratrix of the estate of Leonard Hatton, appealed from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Dr. Alfred H. Kent. On appeal she argues that it was error to exclude the testimony of one of her expert witnesses. She has also filed a petition for writ of mandamus relating to the exclusion of that expert's testimony. Because mandamus is an inappropriate means of reviewing a trial judge's discretionary act (in this case, exclusion of deposition testimony), Ex parte Taylor Coal Co., 401 So.2d 1 (Ala. 1981), and because mandamus will not lie when there is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Echols v. Housing Authority of AuburnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Ex Parte Taylor Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Ex Parte CootsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rudolph v. LindsaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. T.L.L. v. T.F.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Brooks v. Alabama State BarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  5. Rudolph v. LindsaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API