Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Brooks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 16, 1990No. 88-1258PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel Robert Brooks was indicted in a two-count indictment for theft of property in the first degree and possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. A jury found him guilty of theft and acquitted him of possession of a forged instrument. He was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment on the theft conviction.

Brooks was a practicing attorney. He undertook to assist Hazel and William Day in collecting their claim against an insurance company for damage to their property. He eventually received full satisfaction ($16,810.77) of the claim by check, which was made payable to the Days.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ex Parte MarekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. L. & N. R. R. Co. v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  5. Ex Parte AirhartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1992
  2. Duke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  3. Hardy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  4. Ex Parte MyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  5. Marshall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API