Molyneux v. Twin Falls Canal Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SUTPHEN, D. J.
This is an action to recover lost profits on account of an alleged breach of a drainage tunnel contract. The appellant, a Carey Act operating company, advertised for bids in September 1929, for the construction of several tunnels to be drilled from the face of canyon walls back toward lands on its project which had seeped, the purpose being to drain such seeped lands by means of such tunnels. The tunnel involved in the instant case was advertised to be 2,000 feet, more or less, in length.
The respondent was the successful bidder and on September 14, 1929, appellant and respondent…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Sullivan v. McMillanSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
- Pitts v. National Independent Fisheries Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1922
- Prairie Development Co. v. LeibergIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Durand v. HeneyWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Winkelman v. ErwinIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Vincent v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
- Werry v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
- Osborne v. Locke Steel Chain Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Johnson v. Allied Stores Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Durant v. SnyderIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.