Day v. Griffith
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.
Plaintiff Timothy Day brought this declaratory judgment proceeding, consisting of six causes of complaint, to determine several disputes with defendant George Griffith. Defendants Edward C. Kendall and James M. Stirewalt are nominal parties defendant whose interests are substantially the same as Day’s. Day and Kendall did business together, and Stirewalt purchased some of the animals involved herein. Defendant’s answer specifically admitted or denied plaintiff’s allegations and affirmatively alleged seven separate defenses and counterclaims.
At the beginning of the trial, after certain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wiley v. BergOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Estate of Krueger v. RoppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Fischl v. AustOregon Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GeistOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Watson v. BanducciCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Cameron v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Marriage of ShlitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Russell v. GullettOregon Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.