Legal Opinion

Russell v. Gullett

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1979No. 7067, SC 25500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBryson, J.

The parties to this suit are neighbors and own adjoining property in Hines, Oregon. Plaintiffs, the Russells, brought the suit to establish their title by adverse possession to a portion of the property of defendants, the Gulletts. The following diagram, not to scale, shows the disputed area involved on appeal.

Plaintiffs claimed portions of defendants’ front, side, and back yards. The trial court found that plaintiffs had proved their case only with respect to a strip of land in the back yard, where plaintiffs’ predecessors in interest had built a clothesline, and a piece of land under the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Grimstad v. DordanOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Estate of Krueger v. RoppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Beaver v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Nelson v. VandemarrOregon Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Crites v. KochCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  3. Ross v. DeLorenzoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Stiles v. GodseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. Lethin v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API