Fischl v. Aust
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*183LENT, J.
This is a suit in equity for an accounting. We review de novo. ORS 19.125(3). The issues before us are whether defendant entered into a binding agreement to contribute to various union trust funds and, if so, whether plaintiffs, who are the trustees of those funds, are barred by laches from enforcing the agreement. The trial court determined both issues in plaintiffs’ favor. We affirm.
The dispute had its origins in September of 1970, when defendant Aust, who had been conducting a small sign-painting business in Springfield, was considering working as a painting contractor. To…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McIver v. NormanOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Hanns v. HannsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Lichty v. MerzenichOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Ollman v. Active Homes, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by9 opinions
- Albino v. AlbinoOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Estate of Krueger v. RoppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Fontana v. SteensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Russell v. GullettOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Day v. GriffithOregon Supreme Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.