Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Ash

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 18, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0356PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERBER, Judge.

Paul Ash and Elaine Ash (the Ashes) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) determining that the underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage limits under their two automobile policies were $15,000/$30,000. The appeal raises the following issues:(1) Whether the trial court erred in holding that Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (A.R.S.) section 20-259.01(0 (1981) did not require State Farm to make written offers of UIM coverage in limits up to the bodily injury liability limits of its existing insureds’…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Holman v. All Nation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Hastings v. United Pacific Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Courville v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1981
  5. Dewart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Tallent v. National General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  3. Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Blevins v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Chatman v. FerrellDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API