Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 19, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0031PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Marianna and Alen Lawrence (“the Lawrences”) appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) determining that the underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage limits under their automobile policy were $15,000/$30, 000.

We address the following issue in this appeal: Whether the addition of a named insured to a policy is a “modification” within the meaning of Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. (“A.R.S.”) section 20-259.01(C), thereby freeing State Farm from the requirement of providing notice of UIM coverage options to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Ormsbee v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. EVENCHIC v. State Farm Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. INS. CO. OF NORTH AMERICA v. Santa CruzArizona Supreme Court · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blevins v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Blevins v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. State Farm v. BalzanArizona Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API