Legal Opinion

Blevins v. Government Employees Insurance

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 28, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0272PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED OPINION

PORTLEY, Judge.

¶ 1 We are asked to decide whether Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 20-259.01(B) (Supp. 2010) requires that an insured sign a form rejecting underinsured motorist (“UIM”) coverage. Because the statute does not require a signed form, we reverse the summary judgment granted to Michael Blevins and remand this matter to the trial court with instructions to enter summary judgment for Government Employees Insurance Company (“GEICO”).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Blevins purchased auto insurance from GEICO in August 2006. His insurance policy indicated…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Devenir Associates v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arellano v. Primerica Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. Melendez v. Hallmark InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  3. State v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
  4. Chavira v. Armor Designs of Delaware, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  5. Melendez v. Hallmark InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API