Legal Opinion
Thomson v. Koch
Washington Supreme Court
Decided March 14, 1911No. 9056PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Holcomb, J., entered May 27, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mortgage.
1Opinion of the Court
Morris, J.-
Appeal from a decree of foreclosure of mortgage, upon a defense of usury. There is no statement of facts in this case, and the question submitted must be determined upon our holding as to the decree being justified by the findings of fact, from which it appears, that on February 17, 1906, appellants Koch, being indebted to Daniel Schulz in the sum of $8,400, executed and delivered to Schulz the following instrument:
“$8,400. Ritzville, Wash., 2-17-1906.
“On or before six years after date, without grace, I promise to pay to the order of Daniel Schulz thirty-four hundred and no-100…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833
- Gaither v. Farmers & Mechanics Bank of Georgetown Ex Rel. CorcorranSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Weeks v. MedlerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Polo Manufacturing Co. v. ParrNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. HainesMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cissna Loan Co. v. GawleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Bright v. OffieldWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Gloucester Mutual Fishing Insurance v. BoyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Martin v. McAvoyWashington Supreme Court · 1924