Legal Opinion

Gaither v. Farmers & Mechanics Bank of Georgetown Ex Rel. Corcorran

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 29, 1828PublishedCited by 42 opinions

•THIS suit was instituted by the defendants in error, against George R. Gaither, as-the drawer'of a promissory note, dated Georgetown, 24th July 1823,- for 1513 dollars 96 cents; payable - six months after date,- to the order of W. W. Cor-corran & Co. Endorsers, W. W. Corcorran & Co;, and Thomas Corcqrran. ' Before the .swearing of the jury, in.-.the ease, it was stated,' by the counsel of both plaintiff and defendant, to one of the Judges of the Court; who, being a…

Read the full summary

•THIS suit was instituted by the defendants in error, against George R. Gaither, as-the drawer'of a promissory note, dated Georgetown, 24th July 1823,- for 1513 dollars 96 cents; payable - six months after date,- to the order of W. W. Cor-corran & Co. Endorsers, W. W. Corcorran & Co;, and Thomas Corcqrran. ' Before the .swearing of the jury, in.-.the ease, it was stated,' by the counsel of both plaintiff and defendant, to one of the Judges of the Court; who, being a stockholder in the bank, objected to sitting in the case ;■ and the same was also staged tt> the Court, before the jury was…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Johnson

delivered the opinion of .the Court. — .

The plaintiff here was defendant in the Court below, to an action instituted by the Farmers and Mechanics Bank of Georgetown, on a note made by .him to -W. W. Corcorran &■ Co. and by them endorsed in blank to the Bank.

The record makes out a case for this Court, of which the following is a summary: That W. W. Corcorran & Co. discounted their own notes with this Bank, at thirty days • the Bank, expressly stipulating, that in lieu of money they should receive what they call a' post note of their own, payable at a future day, without interest. -The evidence…

2Cited by42 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Oates v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. J. C. Penney Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  4. Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Nichols v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1833

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API