Legal Opinion

Martin v. McAvoy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1924No. 18354PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

This action is to recover alleged usury paid by the bankrupt to respondents McAvoy, and in the second cause of action to recover cars, or the value thereof, re-possessed by McAvoy upon the failure of vendees on conditional sale contracts to complete their payments as agreed. At the time of the bankruptcy of the company, there were outstanding contracts assigned to McAvoy of approximately $138,000.

In 1919, McAvoy and the Mitchell Company, which later became bankrupt, entered into an arrangement whereby, when the Mitchell Company sold automobiles on time, McAvoy would buy the conditional sale…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Bank v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Thomson v. KochWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. World Finance Co. v. Westlake Garage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Wright v. HortonIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Harrison v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schmitt v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  2. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  3. Indian Lake Estates, Inc. v. Special Investments, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  4. Pierce v. C. I. T. Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Commercial Credit Co. v. National Credit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API