Cissna Loan Co. v. Gawley
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for What-com county, Hardin, J., entered April 20, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendants, in an action to foreclose a mortgage, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On April 8, 1910, the respondents, Hector Gawley and Jessie M. Gawley, his wife, executed and delivered to the Home Loan Company, a corporation, then doing business in the city of Bellingham, their j oint and several promissory notes, ninety-six in number, each providing for the payment to the Home Loan Company of the sum of $24.80. The notes were numbered from 1 to 96, inclusive, and were of like tenor and effect, save as to the time of maturity ; the note numbered 1 maturing on the 8th day of the first following month, the note numbered 2 on the 8th day of the second following month, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Eldred v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Krutz v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- Savannah Savings Bank v. LoganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Goodale v. WallaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Richardson v. CampbellNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- A-Z Servicenter, Inc. v. SegallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- French v. Mortgage Guarantee Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Steffen v. Refrigeration Discount Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Easton v. Butterfield Live Stock Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Mesaba Loan Co. v. SherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.