Legal Opinion

Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American Line

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1934No. 7388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Two libels were filed in rem against the motorship Oakland, and in personam against the Hamburg American Line, a corporation, as owner of the motorship Oakland. One of the libels was brought by Hildegard Schoen-amsgruber, a minor, by Gustav Schoenams-gruber as her guardian ad litem, for $250,-000 damages, and the other was brought by Gustav Schoenamsgruber on behalf of himself and his wife as the parents of said minor child for $50,000 damages. Both libels are based upon an alleged breach of a maritime contract for the carriage of the minor child, Hildegard…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  3. France & Canada S. S. Co. v. French RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  4. Cox v. Graves, Knight & Graves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  5. California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. Catz American Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Grain Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
  2. Zalatuka v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API