Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American Line
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
Two libels were filed in rem against the motorship Oakland, and in personam against the Hamburg American Line, a corporation, as owner of the motorship Oakland. One of the libels was brought by Hildegard Schoen-amsgruber, a minor, by Gustav Schoenams-gruber as her guardian ad litem, for $250,-000 damages, and the other was brought by Gustav Schoenamsgruber on behalf of himself and his wife as the parents of said minor child for $50,000 damages. Both libels are based upon an alleged breach of a maritime contract for the carriage of the minor child, Hildegard…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . GoldstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- France & Canada S. S. Co. v. French RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Cox v. Graves, Knight & Graves, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- California Prune & Apricot Growers' Ass'n v. Catz American Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Continental Grain Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Zalatuka v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939