Legal Opinion
Continental Grain Co. v. Dant & Russell, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1941No. 9572PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appellant invoked the admiralty jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon hy applying to that court for an order compelling arbitration of certain obligations growing out of a charter party entered into between appellant and appellee. The agreement for arbitration is contained in the charter party and provides that should any dispute arise between the owners and the insurers the matter in dispute shall be referred to three persons in New York, one to be appointed by each of the parties, and the third by the two so chosen. It was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pennsylvania Railroad v. International Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Lehigh Structural Steel Co. v. Rust Engineering Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1932
- Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American LineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
3Cited by48 opinions
- Eleanor Snyder, of the Estate of Leroy Liljedahl v. Bruton SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Textile Unlimited, Inc., a California Corporation v. A..bmhand Company, Inc., a Georgia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Milos Sovak, M.D. Biophysica, Inc. v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., a Corporation of the Empire of Japan Cook Imaging Corporation, an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- National Iranian Oil Company v. Ashland Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- Dorothy Zosky v. Daniel Boyer and Boenning and ScattergoodCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.