Legal Opinion
Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided December 3, 1929PublishedCited by 226 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cardozo, Ch. J.
By contract dated May 25, 1922, Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Company, a Maine corporation, agreed to sell to Bear Tractors, Inc., a New York corporation, 500 tractors to be manufactured according to specifications and to be delivered in installments. There was an arbitration clause in the following form: “ If for any reason any controversy or difference of opinion shall arise as to the construction of the terms and conditions of this contract, or as to its performance, it is mutually agreed that the matter in dispute shall be settled by arbitration, each party to select an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Fauntleroy v. LumSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by226 opinions
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. SacharowNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Sjoberg v. HastorfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Giblin v. Nassau County Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
221 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.