Legal Opinion
Matter of Hosiery Mfrs. Corp. v. . Goldston
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1924PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPound, J.
A motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not a final order. An order to proceed to arbitrate under an arbitra tion agreement is a final order. We have held (233 N. Y. 373) that it is the end of one special proceeding. The arbitration itself is another special proceeding under the Arbitration Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 72), as amended by chapter 341, Laws of 1923, adding section 6-a to the law. The new section merely' makes the arbitration a special proceeding to meet our decision to the contrary. (204 App. Div. 284; affd., 236 N. Y. 587.)
Petitioner and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Matter of Zimmerman v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Kelso Co. v. . EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- In Re the Arbitration Between Priore & SchermerhornNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- In re LowenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In re Interocean Mercantile Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
- De Sapio v. KohlmeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Sherrill v. Grayco Builders, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.