Legal Opinion

Nevins v. New Hampshire Department of Resources & Economic Development

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 11, 2002No. 2000-149PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Superior Court (McGuire, J.) granting summary judgment to the defendants, the New *485Hampshire Department of Resources and Economic Development (DRED), the commissioner of DRED, and the administrator of the land management division. The court denied the plaintiffs’ request to declare that the defendants acted illegally in permitting the erection of a 180-foot telecommunication tower on the summit of Mt. Kearsarge and refused to order removal of the tower. We affirm.

In 1949, the Society for the Protection of New Hampshire Forests deeded to the State of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Smith v. New Hampshire Board of Examiners of PsychologistsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  2. Appeal of MorganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
  3. In re SmithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Appeal of Behavior Science InstituteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heartz v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Appeal of BlizzardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Maxi Drug North, Inc. v. Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of Health & Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API