New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Rochester
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtHorton, J.
The defendant, City of Rochester, appeals a decision of the Superior Court (Fitzgerald, J.) granting plaintiff New England Telephone and Telegraph Company’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse and remand.
The plaintiff provides telecommunications services to the residents of the city of Rochester. The defendant issued the plaintiff licenses for the location of “poles, wires, cables and other similar equipment” on city-maintained highways. See RSA 231:161, 1(b), IV (1993). Pursuant to RSA 231:163 (1993), which permits license alterations “whenever the public good requires,” the Rochester…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of FranklinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
- Del Norte, Inc. v. ProvencherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Catalano v. Town of WindhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- King Ridge, Inc. v. Town of SuttonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Appeal of EastonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dean & v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Pro Con Construction, Inc. v. Acadia InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Verizon New England, Inc. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Forbes Farm Partnership v. Farm Family Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- Verizon New England, Inc. v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.