Legal Opinion

Mann v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 1, 2016No. CV-15-595PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobin F. Wynne, Associate Justice

hRandeep S. Mann appeals following entry of an order by the Crittenden County Circuit Court granting partial summary judgment in favor of Dr, Trent Pierce and Melissa Pierce as to liability for tort claims the Pierces brought against Mann. A. jury subsequently determined that the Pierces had sustained damages in the amount of $122,600,000, and the circuit court entered a judgment in that amount. Mann argues that the circuit court erred in applying the doctrine of offensive collateral estoppel in granting partial summary judgment on liability in favor of the Pierces. Our court of appeals…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. American Family Mutual Insurance v. SavickasIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  5. Aubert v. AubertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. California State Teachers' Retirement System v. AlvarezSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. United States v. One Assortment of 93 NFA Regulated WeaponsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  3. Five Forks Hunting Club, LLC v. Nixon Family PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2019
  4. Emis v. EmisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Tommy Lee Thigpen v. City of El Dorado, ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2020

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API