California State Teachers' Retirement System v. Alvarez
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
VALIHURA, Justice:
The Court of Chancery initially found that Wal-Mart stockholders who were attempting to prosecute derivative claims in Delaware could no longer do so because another court, a federal court in Arkansas, had reached a final judgment on the issue of demand futility first, and the stockholders were adequately represented in that action. But the derivative plaintiffs in Delaware assert that applying issue preclusion in this context violates their Due Process rights.
This dispute implicates complex questions of law and policy, including: the relationship among competing derivative…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2018
- Rogers v. MorganSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Amerisourcebergen Corp v. Lebanon County Employees' Retirement FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
- Deborah Pettry and Gail Friedt v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- Deborah Pettry and Gail Friedt v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.