Maas v. Anchor Fire-Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Menominee; Stone, J. Assumpsit by Augusta Maas against the Anchor Fire-Insurance Company of Cincinnati, Ohio, on a policy of insurance. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
September 7, 1904, defendant issued to plaintiff a policy insuring against loss by fire a certain dwelling house situated on the west shore of Green Bay, about 10 miles distant from the city of Menominee. The house burned November 16, 1904, and this suit is brought to recover for the loss.
Plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment in the trial court. Defendant asks us to reverse that judgment upon three grounds. One of those grounds, viz., that the deed of the land upon which the house stood was not in plaintiff’s name, is based upon a breach of a representation contained in the application…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Twiss v. GeorgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Frame v. FrameWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Welch v. WhelpleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Lamb v. HinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Dupreau v. Hibernia InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bakker v. FellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Stonehouse v. StonehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Bakker v. FellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908