Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Hinman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1880PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Motion for leave to file a substituted return. Appeal from Berrien. Specific performance. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

An appeal having been taken to this court from the decree rendered in this cause, counsel for appellant, without any order from this court or special reason existing therefor, before return made, placed the originaL minutes of the oral testimony, which had been taken in open, court, in the hands of a printer, to have the record printed,, on his promise to save and return it; but, when printed, the-original manuscript was then destroyed by the printer.. Upon such a showing a motion is made for leave to file a. copy of the evidence in lieu or as a substitute for the original destroyed. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Case v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Wright v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Jones v. TylerMichigan Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Kinyon v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re Williams' EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Dickinson v. WrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Hunt v. HaytSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  4. Willard v. ShekellMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Kelsey v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API