Legal Opinion

Stonehouse v. Stonehouse

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1909No. Docket No. 72PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Kent; McDonald, J. Bill by Albert Stonehouse against Delbert Stonehouse and others for the specific performance of a land contract. From an order overruling a demurrer to the bill, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, C. J.

Complainant and his wife were defendants in the ease of Gleason v. Stonehouse, reported in 149 Mich., at page 611. The bill in that case was filed to set aside a deed of certain premises on the ground that *44the deed was never delivered, to determine that complainant was the owner of the undivided one-third thereof, and for an accounting. This court determined that the deed was not delivered, that the complainant was entitled to the rents and profits of her one-third interest, subject to any defense that might be made in the accounting case pending in the circuit court, and entered decree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Low v. LowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Bakker v. FellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Michie v. EllairMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Maas v. Anchor Fire-InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Steward v. PanekMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Estate of Shinoe v. ShinoeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API