Legal Opinion

Cole v. Bartels

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2000No. S-9050PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Constance Cole sold Thomas and Janet Bartels a home with decayed walls The Bartelses sued Cole, claiming that she willfully failed to disclose the defect. Cole filed a third-party claim against carpenter Charles Bourque, alleging that he had failed to fully disclose the "wall rot" to Cole. Bourque cross-claimed on the basis that Cole never paid him for his services A jury found against Cole on all claims and awarded Bo-urque and the Bartelses compensatory and punitive damages. The superior court awarded prejudgment interest on the compensatory award and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NicholsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hopper v. HopperAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API