Cole v. Bartels
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FABE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Constance Cole sold Thomas and Janet Bartels a home with decayed walls The Bartelses sued Cole, claiming that she willfully failed to disclose the defect. Cole filed a third-party claim against carpenter Charles Bourque, alleging that he had failed to fully disclose the "wall rot" to Cole. Bourque cross-claimed on the basis that Cole never paid him for his services A jury found against Cole on all claims and awarded Bo-urque and the Bartelses compensatory and punitive damages. The superior court awarded prejudgment interest on the compensatory award and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. NicholsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Demoski v. NewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Glamann v. KirkAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Liimatta v. VestAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Hopper v. HopperAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Suffield Development Associates Ltd. Partnership v. National Loan Investors, L.P.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.