Legal Opinion

Reid v. Williams

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1998No. S-7839PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Elliott Reid sued Dr. David Williams for medical malpractice and prevailed at trial. Applying AS 09.55.548(b), the superior court subtracted Reid’s medical expenses paid by Reid’s insurer from the jury’s medical expenses award. Concluding that it was a reasonable legislative response to a perceived medical malpractice insurance crisis, we reject Reid’s argument that the statute violates his substantive due process rights. Concluding that the classification between doctors and other tort defendants bears a fair and substantial relation to attainment of a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Fein v. Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Zeman v. Lufthansa German AirlinesAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Arneson v. OlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Jenkins v. HandelAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. L.D.G., Inc. v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Valdez Fisheries Development Ass'n v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API