Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 10, 1936PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
In June, 1928, the defendant issued two policies of insurance upon the fife of the plaintiff’s husband, Michael T. O’Connor, aggregating $5000 in amount, both naming the plaintiff as beneficiary. The premiums were to be paid quarterly and they might be paid at the home office of the defendant or to an authorized agent, but only in exchange for the company’s official premium receipt signed by certain officers and countersigned by the representative of the company receiving the money. A grace period of thirty-one days after a premium became due was allowed. Payment of a premium “shall not…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- New York Life Insurance v. FletcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Bernhard v. Rochester German InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Bennecke v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Jenkins v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Cohen v. Holloways', Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Curran v. Connecticut Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.