Legal Opinion

Allen v. Urban Renewal Agency

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 11, 1964No. 43,464PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fatzer, J.:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order vacating the verdict and granting the Urban Renewal Agency, the condemner, a new trial.

The facts are briefly summarized: The Urban Renewal Agency commenced this proceeding to condemn land on East Fourth Street in the city of Topeka upon which a two-story brick building, approximately 60 years old, was located. Appraisers were appointed by the court, who made an award to the landowner in the sum of $14,300. The landowner, and the tenant who occupied the first floor of the building, appealed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  2. Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  3. Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  4. Bishop v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Gould v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mettee v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Barajas v. SondersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  3. Hornback v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  4. Harriman v. Penny Ready-Mixed Concrete & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
  5. Hornback v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API