Allen v. Urban Renewal Agency
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fatzer, J.:
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order vacating the verdict and granting the Urban Renewal Agency, the condemner, a new trial.
The facts are briefly summarized: The Urban Renewal Agency commenced this proceeding to condemn land on East Fourth Street in the city of Topeka upon which a two-story brick building, approximately 60 years old, was located. Appraisers were appointed by the court, who made an award to the landowner in the sum of $14,300. The landowner, and the tenant who occupied the first floor of the building, appealed to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nicholas v. LathamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
- Bateman v. RollerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Angell v. HesterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Bishop v. HuffmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
- Gould v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mettee v. Urban Renewal AgencySupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Barajas v. SondersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Hornback v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Harriman v. Penny Ready-Mixed Concrete & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964
- Hornback v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Rld. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964