Legal Opinion

Pleasant Valley Neighborhood Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning Commission of South Windsor

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 5, 1988No. 5526; 5536PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This combined appeal arises from a judgment of the trial court which overturned the defendant planning and zoning commission’s grant of a zone change application. The application was submitted by the defendant developers as a precedent to the construction of the proposed Winchester Mall on the Manchester-South Windsor town line. The defendants claim that the trial court erred (1) in concluding that the commission had violated the uniformity requirement of General Statutes § 8-2 by requiring a buffer strip between commercial and residential zones in this instance and not in other similar…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burnham v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. First Hartford Realty Corp. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  4. Central Bank for Savings v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  5. Veseskis v. Bristol Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Homart Development Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. MacKenzie v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Campion v. New Haven Board of Aldermen, No. Cv 02-0462505 S (Mar. 21, 2003)Connecticut Superior Court · 2003
  4. Bay City Developers v. Town of Hamden, No. 30 22 98 (Sep. 20, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  5. Floch v. Planning Zoning Comm., of Westport, No. 311201 (Jun. 27, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API