Koal Industries Corp. v. Asland, S.A.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Defendants Asland, S.A. (“Asland”), Joaquin Bertrán, Miguel del Campo, Alberto Vínolas and Joaquin Targhetta have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, pursuant to Rule 12(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., and/ or, in the alternative, for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
At the heart of this litigation is the Sugarloaf Mine, which is located in Arkansas and operated by the Sugarloaf Mining Corporation (“SMC”). In 1982, plaintiff Southern States…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,815 Itoba Limited v. Lep Group Plc, William R. Berkley, John L. Read, Peter J. Grant, John R. EastCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- 131 Main Street Associates v. MankoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Bank of America Corp. v. LemgruberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.