Legal Opinion
Henneberry v. Sumitomo Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 2006No. 04 Civ.2128(PKL)PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
This action arises out of a failed investment transaction between William Henneberry, the Chief Executive Officer and majority common stock shareholder of Smartix International Corp. (“Smartix”), and defendant-investor Sumitomo Corporation of America (“SCOA”), Robert Graustein, a Senior Vice president of SCOA, and Sumitomo Corporation (“Sumitomo”), SCOA’s parent company. In a complaint dated March 17, 2004, plaintiff asserted causes of action against all defendants for (1) detrimental reliance, on the alternative bases of promissory estoppel and…
2Cases cited174 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
169 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Madu, Edozie & Madu, P.C. v. Socketworks Ltd. NigeriaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- RSM PRODUCTION CORP. v. FridmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Meisel v. GrunbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Kottler v. Deutsche Bank AGDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- B & M Linen, Corp. v. Kannegiesser, USA, Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.