Waldrip v. Graco Corp.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Josephine Linker Hart, Judge.
Appellant, the employee-
claimant, appeals from the decision of the Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission finding that he failed to meet his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that marijuana did not substantially occasion his injury. He contends that the Commission’s decision was not supported by substantial evidence. We affirm the Commission’s decision.
A compensable injury does not include an “[ijnjury where the accident was substantially occasioned by” the use of illegal drugs. Ark. Code Ann. § ll-9-102(4)(B)(iv)(hJ (Supp. 2007). Further,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Woodall v. Hunnicutt ConstructionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Flowers v. Norman Oaks Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Wood v. West Tree ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- Telling Industries v. PettyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Edmisten v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Townley v. Georgia Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
- Jackson v. Smith Blair, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010
- Prock v. Bull Shoals LandingCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.