Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Smith Blair, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 20, 2010No. CA 10-539Published

1Opinion of the Court

RITAW. GRUBER, Judge.

1, Charlie Jackson appeals the Workers’ Compensation Commission’s decision of April 30, 2010, denying his claim for the compensability of a back injury he allegedly sustained at his workplace. He contends that the Commission erred in denying his claim based on the statutory presumption of Ark.Code Ann. § 11 — 9— 102(4)(B)(iv) that his injury was caused by the use of illegal drugs. We affirm.

An injury is not compensable if “the accident was substantially occasioned by the use of alcohol, illegal drugs, or prescription drugs used in contravention of physician’s orders.”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Woodall v. Hunnicutt ConstructionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Flowers v. Norman Oaks Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Brown v. Alabama Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998
  5. Hickey v. GardisserCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API