ERC Contractor Yard & Sales v. Robertson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.
This case is before us on review from the Arkansas Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals agreed with appellants ERC Contractor Yard & Sales and Liberty Mutual Insurance (hereinafter referred to as ERC) that there was a presence of alcohol, however small, in appellee Lonnie Robertson’s blood. However, the Court of Appeals concluded that substantial evidence existed to support the finding by the Workers’ Compensation Commission that Mr. Robertson’s injury was not substantially occasioned by the use of alcohol. ERC Contr. Yard & Sales v. Robertson, 60 Ark. App.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Travis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Citizens to Establish a Reform Party v. PriestSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Vanderpool v. Fidelity & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Frette v. City of SpringdaleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- White v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Ester v. National Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Prock v. Bull Shoals Boat LandingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- Clemmons v. Office of Child Support EnforcementSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.