Legal Opinion

United States v. Burton Coal Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 1927No. 100PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Butler

The judgment is for damages for breach of contract by the United States to accept and pay for co'al purchased from appellee for use at army posts in the Chicago district. The only question presented for our consideration is whether the Court of Claims applied the right measure. It gave the difference between contract price and market value at the times and places specified for deliveries. Appellant maintains that, upon the facts of the case, that rule is not applicable, and'that appellee is limited to recovery of the amount of profits it would have realized if appellant had accepted and paid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Kadish v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  3. United States v. Wyckoff Pipe & Creosoting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Garfield & Proctor Coal Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  2. New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Bailey Specialized Buildings, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  5. Trans World Metals, Inc., Trans-World Metals and Co. Limited, and Trans World Metals, Limited v. Southwire CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API