Legal Opinion

Eaton v. National Casualty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1922No. 17347PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— Respondent sued upon a policy of insurance issued to him by the appellant company, claiming compensation for total disability, at the contract rate of $100 per month, from May 29 to August 20, 1920, and for a period of six months from August 20, 1920, at the contract rate of $50 per month, for alleged partial disability, occasioned by an accident in a logging camp to him.

On a trial before a jury, the claim for $100 per month total disability compensation was excluded from the consideration of the jury, so that the verdict of the jury was returned solely for partial disability, which was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. FreedmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Ketcham v. American Mutual Accident Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Globe Reserve Mutual Life Insurance v. DuffyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
  5. Askey v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kay v. Occidental Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Kearney v. Washington National InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Fox v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Miller v. United Pacific Casualty InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BackstromWashington Supreme Court · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API